NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.23A
ALIENATION OF AFFECTION-STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
NOTE WELL: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 52-13, effective October
1, 2009, and applicable to actions arising from acts
occurring on or after that date, provides as follows:
(a) No act of the defendant shall give rise to a cause
of action for alienation of affection. . . that occurs
after the plaintiff and the plaintiff's spouse physically
separate with the intent of either the plaintiff or
plaintiff's spouse that the physical separation remain
permanent.
(b) An action for alientation of affection. . . shall not
be commenced more than three years from the last act
of the defendant giving rise to the cause of action.
This instruction incorporates the foregoing statutory
amendment and should be used in all actions arising
from acts occurring on or after October 1, 2009.
Actions arising from acts occurring prior to October 1,
2009, are governed solely by the North Carolina
Supreme Court decision in McCutchen v. McCutchen,
360 N.C. 280, 624 S.E. 2d 620 (2006). For actions
arising from acts occurring before October 1, 2009, use
N.C.P.I.-Civil 800.23 ("Alienation of Affection - Statute
of Limitations").
The (state number) issue reads:
“Did the plaintiff file this action within three years of the date of
the last act of the defendant giving rise to the plaintiff’s claim?”1
If you have answered the (state number) issue “Yes” in favor of the
plaintiff, the plaintiff's claim may nonetheless be legally barred by what
is called the statute of limitations.2 The law provides that a lawsuit
claiming alienation of affection must be filed within three years of the
date of the last act of the defendant which gave rise to the plaintiff’s
claim. [The law further provides that if the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s
spouse have physically separated with the intent on the part of either the
plaintiff or his spouse that the physical separation remain permanent,
then no act of the defendant which occurs following such separation may
give rise to the plaintiff’s alienation of affection claim.]3 The plaintiff
filed the present lawsuit on (state date of filing of alienation of affection
action).
By answering issue (state number) “Yes” in favor of the plaintiff,
you found that the malicious and wrongful conduct of the defendant
consisted of [an act] [acts] which occurred prior to the physical
separation of the plaintiff and his spouse with the intent on the part of
either the plaintiff or his spouse that the physical separation remain
permanent.
On this (state number) issue, the burden of proof is on the
plaintiff.4 This means that the plaintiff must now prove, by the greater
weight of the evidence, that the last act of the defendant upon which you
based your finding in issue (state number) must have occurred less than
three years before the date of the filing of this lawsuit by the plaintiff.
Finally, as to this issue on which the plaintiff has the burden of
proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the plaintiff
filed this action within three years of the date of the last act of the
defendant giving rise to the plaintiff’s claim, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue “Yes” in favor of the plaintiff.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue “No” in favor of the defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.23A (June 2010). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
cfbddf4e4f0c1c487ce81debff6ec35b1c89e0b6a7817db92b0dab9098321fc4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.