NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.11
NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION: DAMAGES.
The (state number) issue reads:
"What amount is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the
defendant as damages for negligent misrepresentation?"
If you have answered the (state number) issue "Yes" in favor of the
plaintiff, then the plaintiff is entitled to recover nominal damages even
without proof of actual damages. Nominal damages consist of some
trivial amount such as one dollar in recognition of a technical injury to the
plaintiff.
The plaintiff may also be entitled to recover actual damages. On
this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means that the
plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, the amount of
actual damages proximately1 caused by the negligent misrepresentation
of the defendant.
Proximate cause is a cause which in a natural and continuous
sequence produces a person's damage, and is a cause which a reasonable
and prudent person could have foreseen would probably produce such
damage or some similar injurious result.
There may be more then one proximate cause of damage.
Therefore the plaintiff need not prove that the negligent
misrepresentation of the defendant was the sole proximate cause of the
damage. The plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence,
only that the negligent misrepresentation of the defendant was a
proximate cause.
The damages recoverable for a negligent misrepresentation are
those necessary to compensate the plaintiff for his pecuniary loss
proximately caused by the misrepresentation of the defendant.2
Pecuniary loss is a financial or monetary loss suffered by the plaintiff.
[Pecuniary loss may include [the difference between the value of what
the plaintiff has received in the transaction and its purchase price or
other value given for it]3 [and] [financial or monetary loss suffered
otherwise as a consequence of the plaintiff's reliance upon the
misrepresentation4].]5
The plaintiff's damages are to be reasonably determined from the
evidence presented. Your award must be fair and just. You may not
award any damages based upon speculation or conjecture.6
Finally, as to the (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has
the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence the
amount of actual damages proximately caused by the negligent
misrepresentation of the defendant, then it would be your duty to write
that amount in the blank space provided.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to write a nominal sum such as one dollar in the blank space provided.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 800.11 (June 2007). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
979bb9596f2fc4f39bdbea3bb133d0594d9dac341d59749361bf7add4682621f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.