NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 741.35
WARRANTIES IN SALES OF GOODS-REMEDIES-RIGHTFUL REJECTION.
The (state number) issue reads:
"Did the plaintiff rightfully reject the defendant's [delivery] [tender]
of the (name good)?"1
You will answer this issue only if you have answered the (state
number) issue "Yes" in favor of the plaintiff.
On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means
the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, two
things:
First, that the plaintiff rejected the (name good) within a
reasonable time after its [delivery] [tender] by the defendant. (The
plaintiff cannot reject the (name good) if he has already accepted it.)2
Second, that the plaintiff seasonably notified the defendant of the
rejection. (If the defect is ascertainable by reasonable inspection and
the defendant could have cured it had he known what it was, the
plaintiff's notice must state the particular defect.)3
Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which the plaintiff has
the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that
the plaintiff rightfully rejected the defendant's [delivery] [tender] of the
(name good), then it would be your duty to answer this issue "Yes" in
favor of the plaintiff.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, it would be your duty to
answer this issue "No" in favor of the defendant.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 741.35 (May 1999). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
ec304b61eed89dd7662dc36fe40129a719b63fe3402534d3885104e710dc3b6b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.