Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 741.05

WARRANTIES IN SALES OF GOODS - ISSUE OF EXISTENCE OF EXPRESS WARRANTY.

activein force · 1999-05-01 – presentas-observed

The (state number) issue reads:

"Did the defendant expressly warrant to the plaintiff that the (name

good) would conform to a [promise or representation of fact] [description]

[sample or model]?1

On this issue the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. This means

that the plaintiff must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, that

the defendant expressly warranted that the (name good) would conform

to a [promise or representation of fact] [description] [sample or model].

To create an express warranty, a seller need not use such formal

words such as "warrant" or "guarantee," or even have a specific intention

to create a warranty. Moreover, a warranty is not created by a mere

statement of the value of a (name good) or a seller's mere opinion or

commendation of a (name good).2

An express warranty may be created in several ways.

[A seller creates an express warranty by making a promise or

representation of fact to the buyer which relates to the (name good)

being sold and which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between

them. An express warranty created this way requires the (name good)

being sold to conform to the seller's promise or representation of fact.]3

[A seller (also) creates an express warranty by making a description

of the (name good) being sold part of the basis of the bargain with the

buyer. An express warranty created this way requires the (name good)

being sold to conform to the seller's description.]4

[A seller (also) creates an express warranty by showing or

demonstrating to the buyer a sample or model of the (name good) being

sold. An express warranty created this way requires the (name good)

being sold to conform to the seller's sample or model.]5

Finally, as to this (state number) issue, on which the plaintiff has

the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that

the defendant expressly warranted to the plaintiff that the (name good)

would conform to a [promise or representation of fact] [description]

[sample or model], then it would be your duty to answer this issue "Yes"

in favor of the plaintiff.

If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, it would be your duty to

answer this issue "No" in favor of the defendant.

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 741.05 (May 1999). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
d8dd5fd914174fa629b3fe8c97a9bdd4fda2150cc8b7ad309b408a2e2841dac0
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.