Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 735.05

ACTION FOR SERVICES RENDERED A DECEDENT-EVIDENCE OF PROMISE TO COMPENSATE BY WILL.

activein force · 1977-12-01 – presentas-observed

The plaintiff has offered evidence tending to show that (name

decedent) promised (name plaintiff) that he would (describe alleged

promise) in return for services to be rendered by (name plaintiff) and that

(name plaintiff) relied on such promise in rendering services.

A promise to [will real estate] [to compensate a person by leaving

him something by will] is not legally enforceable unless it is in writing,

and the plaintiff may not enforce such a promise and recover what was

promised, but evidence of such promise is evidence which you may

consider in determining whether (name decedent) intended to

compensate (name plaintiff) for services rendered and whether (name

plaintiff) rendered services in expectation that he would be compensated.

You will consider this evidence with all the other evidence, in

determining whether there was an agreement that (name plaintiff) was to

be compensated for services.2

(You will also consider such evidence in determining the period of

time for which plaintiff is to be compensated, as I will instruct you more

fully on the issue:)3

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 735.05 (December 1977). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
226f65a72dbf458a9c16b6e7a7dc79ab08991d9b8868a698b22d9a6e1f65b739
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.