NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 640.32
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP-MITIGATION OF DAMAGES.
"By what amount, if any, should the plaintiff's actual damages be
reduced?"
You are to answer this issue only if you have awarded the plaintiff
actual damages in the preceding issue.
On this issue the burden of proof is on the defendant.1 This means
that the defendant must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, by
what amount, if any, the plaintiff's actual damages should be reduced.
[The plaintiff's actual damages must be reduced by the amount he
[has earned] [will earn] from substitute employment (during the
unexpired term of his employment agreement).2 Substitute employment
is new or additional employment that becomes available to the plaintiff
as the result of being terminated. 3 Actual damages may not be reduced
on account of income the plaintiff [has earned] [will earn] from a source
already available to him and in addition to his employment with the
defendant.4]
[The plaintiff's actual damages must (also) be reduced by the
amount he [has received] [will receive] from [unemployment benefits]
[severance pay] [unearned benefits retained] [(state other benefits).]
[The plaintiff's actual damages must (also) be reduced by the
amount which the plaintiff, with reasonable diligence, could have earned
from similar employment in the same locality (during the unexpired term
of his employment agreement).5 Reasonable diligence does not require
that an employee seek or accept just any available employment. Rather,
reasonable diligence requires that an employee seek and accept similar
employment in the same locality.6]
Finally, as to this issue on which the defendant has the burden of
proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the plaintiff's
actual damages should be reduced under the rules I have explained to
you, then you will answer this issue in favor of the defendant by writing
the amount of that reduction in the blank space provided.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue in favor of the plaintiff by writing the word "None" in
the blank space provided.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 640.32 (June 2014). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
c4c2d74b89db923d26c608337e234c77925d55f98fd3e9ebb08d73e991cf13ce
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.