NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 640.30
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP-DAMAGES.
This issue reads:
“What amount of damages is the plaintiff entitled to recover?”
You are to answer this issue only if you have answered the (state
number(s))1 issue(s) in favor of the plaintiff. If you have so answered
those issue(s), the plaintiff would be entitled to recover nominal
damages even without proof of actual damages. Nominal damages
consist of some trivial amount such as one dollar in recognition of a
technical injury to the plaintiff resulting from the [breach of the
employment agreement] [wrongful termination] [adverse employment
action].
In order to recover more than nominal damages, the burden of
proof is on the plaintiff to prove, by the greater weight of the evidence,
two things:
First, that the plaintiff has suffered actual damages by reason of
the [breach of the employment agreement] [wrongful termination]
[adverse employment action].
Second, the amount of such actual damages.2
Actual damages consist of that amount of money necessary to
place the plaintiff in the same economic position in which he would have
been if the [breach] [wrongful termination] [adverse employment action]
had not occurred.
(If you find, by the greater weight of the evidence, that the
plaintiff's actual damages include future losses, then the amount you
allow for future losses must be reduced to present value, because a
smaller sum received now is equal to a larger sum received in the future.)
Finally, as to this issue on which the plaintiff has the burden of
proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the plaintiff
has suffered actual damages under the rules I have explained to you,
then you will answer this issue by writing that amount in the blank space
provided.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue by writing a nominal amount such as “One Dollar” in
the blank space provided.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 640.30 (June 2010). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
8071ce4e15fdbe5ca12662973aa32dc90a6dbb78b5c0a60cf481debb176f211e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.