NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 503.75
BREACH OF CONTRACT - SPECIAL DAMAGES - LOSS OF PROFITS.
NOTE WELL: This instruction previously was labeled
“N.C.P.I.–Civil 517.20 Breach of Contract - Special
Damages - Loss of Profits.” It has been revised and
renumbered as N.C.P.I.-Civil 503.75.
A party injured by a breach of contract may (also) be entitled to
recover special or consequential damages, that is, actual economic losses
that occur because of special circumstances or conditions attending a
breach of contract,2 such as loss of profits from other transactions.
Before you may award such damages, the [plaintiff] [defendant]
must prove two things by the greater weight of the evidence:
First, he must prove that, as a result of the breach of contract, he
has suffered a loss of profits from other transactions, and that this loss
was within the contemplation of the parties at the time they made the
contract.3 Loss of such profits would have been within the contemplation
of the contracting parties if: (1) the parties were aware of the special
circumstances or conditions that would give rise to a loss of profits, and
(2) the loss of profits was reasonably foreseeable to one who was aware
of these special circumstances or conditions.4
And Second, the [plaintiff] [defendant] must prove the amount of
the loss of such profits with a reasonable degree of certainty.5 This does
not mean that the [plaintiff] [defendant] must prove the amount of his
loss with mathematical exactness or with absolute certainty. It does
mean, however, that these damages, if any, may not be based upon
conjecture, speculation, or guesswork.6 An award of damages for loss of
profits must be based upon actual facts from which a reasonably accurate
conclusion regarding the amount of the loss can be logically and
rationally drawn.7
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 503.75 (June 2013). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
c349efa419cb8e8ced2d4874c2ed82d0661c9f4c00e50f0eb160dd685ca240d8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.