NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 503.27
CONTRACTS - ISSUE OF COMMON LAW REMEDY - DIRECT DAMAGES - OWNER'S MEASURE OF RECOVERY FOR A PARTIAL BREACH OF A REPAIR OR SERVICES CONTRACT.
Direct damages are the economic losses that usually or customarily
result1 from a breach of contract. In this case, you will determine direct
damages, if any, by determining the reasonable cost to the plaintiff of
labor and materials (and other costs) necessary to
[complete the [repair] [(name service)] in conformity with the
requirements of the contract]
[correct the [repair] [(name service)] to bring it into conformity with
the requirements of the contract.2
(NOTE WELL: If there is any evidence that the cost to
correct would be economically unreasonable, the court
must give the following additional instruction:
However, if you find that this corrective work would be
economically unreasonable to perform under the
circumstances, a different measure of damages will
apply. In determining whether this corrective work
would be economically unreasonable to perform, you
may consider
[whether the [repair] [name service] can be corrected only at a cost
that is unreasonably disproportionate to the value to be added to the
(name item or service) by performing the corrective [repair] [name
service]3
[whether a substantial portion of the (name item or service) would
have to be [undone] [redone] [destroyed] in order to perform the
corrective [repair] [name service]4
[whether the plaintiff will be denied the substantial benefit of his
bargain unless the corrective [repair] [name service] is performed, even if
a significant amount of the [repair] [name service] already completed
must be [undone] [redone] [destroyed].5
[whether the parties' expectations regarding a remedy for non-
conforming work are set forth in their contract].6
If you find that the corrective [repair] [name service] proposed by
the plaintiff would be economically unreasonable to perform under these
circumstances, then you instead determine the plaintiff's direct damages,
if any, as follows: First, you will determine the fair market value of the
(name item or service) as actually performed by the defendant on [the
date that (describe events constituting breach)] [(specify date)].
Second, you will determine the fair market value the (name item or
service) would have had if it had been [repaired] [performed] in
conformity with the requirements of the contract.7 Fair market value is
the amount which would be agreed upon as a fair price by a seller who
wishes to sell, but is not compelled to do so, and a buyer who wishes to
buy, but is not compelled to do so.8 Third, you will subtract the fair
market value of the (name item or service) had it been [repaired]
[performed] as contracted for from the fair market value of the (name
item or service) as actually [repaired] [performed]. [The difference would
be the plaintiff's direct damages.] [The difference less any portion of the
contract price which the plaintiff has not paid to the defendant would be
the plaintiff's direct damages.]
If, on the other hand, you find that it is not economically
unreasonable under the circumstances to perform the corrective work,
then the plaintiff would be entitled to recover the reasonable cost of
labor and materials (and other costs) necessary to [repair] [perform] the
(name item or service) in conformity with the requirements of the
contract.)]
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 503.27 (May 2003). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
3ace49001132059a7c086b236f152334dd89240d5867ea3fcfdbc60001a1d5f1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.