NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Civil 502.50
CONTRACTS - ISSUE OF BREACH-DEFENSE OF RESCISSION.
The (state number) issue reads:
"Did the plaintiff and the defendant mutually assent to cancel their
contract?"
(You will answer this issue only if you have answered the (state
number)1 issue "Yes" in favor of the plaintiff.)
On this issue the burden of proof is on the defendant. This means
that the defendant must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence,
that the plaintiff and the defendant mutually assented to cancel their
contract.2 Mutual assent to cancel a contract must be determined from
[written words] [verbal expressions] [conduct] of the parties which [are]
[is] positive, unequivocal and inconsistent with the continuation of the
contract.3 Each party's [written words] [verbal expressions] [conduct]
[are] [is] to be given such meaning as a reasonable person would give
under the same or similar circumstances. In determining what meaning a
reasonable person would give to the parties' [written words] [verbal
expressions] [conduct], you should consider the evidence as to all the
circumstances existing at the time of the alleged cancellation. (Where
one party positively and unequivocally [abandons] [repudiates] the
contract and the other party positively and unequivocally [consents to]
[acquiesces in] the [abandonment] [repudiation], the parties have
mutually assented to cancel the contract.)4
Finally, as to the (state number) issue on which the defendant has
the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that
the plaintiff and the defendant mutually assented to cancel their
contract, then it would be your duty to answer this issue "Yes" in favor of
the defendant.
If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty
to answer this issue "No" in favor of the plaintiff.
History
N.C.P.I.—Civil 502.50 (May 2003). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
1d31e6ca2687267547f3708d2241db29ff1ff931b7a787d5a7100870ea42a8bf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.