Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Civil 102.35

CONTENTIONS OF NEGLIGENCE.

activein force · 1994-03-01 – presentas-observed

In this case, the plaintiff contends, and the defendant denies, that

the defendant was negligent in one or more of the following ways:

(Read all contentions of negligence supported by the

evidence.)

The plaintiff further contends, and the defendant denies, that the

defendant's negligence was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's [injury]

[damage].

I instruct you that negligence is not to be presumed from the mere

fact of [injury] [damage].

(Give law as to each contention of negligence included

above.)

History

N.C.P.I.—Civil 102.35 (March 1994). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
b83eae669a885b2fef6dd91b9ae5b40986df9820d58b3cb6c8ef647b103d0947
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.