MT · rules
Mont. Water Right Claim Examination R. 34
Amendments to Claims
RULE 34(a). Claimant request to modify claim. A claimant
may request and authorize a modification of their claim prior to
that claim’s inclusion in an interlocutory decree issued for the
particular basin.
RULE 34(b). Amendment of claim. An amendment is
required to alter any element of a claim when that element cannot
be clarified or changed in accordance with these rules.
RULE 34(c). Amendment form. An amendment form or a
written request must be submitted by the claimant to authorize an
amendment. An amendment form is attached as Exhibit C.
(1) The amendment request, whether on an amendment
form or other written request, must include the amendment and
the date.
(2) The amendment request must contain the notarized
signature of all current owners of the right as listed in the
centralized record system or a legal authorized representative.
The amendment may not be submitted by a non-owner (e.g.,
tenant, ranch manager, forest service district employee).
(3) The amendment request may include the reasons for
the amendment and may be supplemented with maps, letters,
copies of documents, or other materials.
RULE 34(d). Processing of amendment. An amendment
received by the department will be processed in the following
manner:
(1) if received prior to printing the decree, it will be
microfilmed or scanned, added to the claim file, and the respective
elements will be amended in the centralized record system; or
(2) if received after printing of the decree, it will be
microfilmed or scanned and sent to the water court.
RULE 34(e). Examination of amendment. The department
will examine amendments according to the procedures in the rule
governing the amended element.
RULE 34(f). Summary report. In the summary report to the
water court, the department shall provide on each abstract the
following data and facts concerning the amended claim:
(1) the claimed or clarified element as amended;
(2) a remark indicating the date the amendment was
received and the water right element changed;
Example:
THE FLOW RATE WAS AMENDED BY THE CLAIMANT ON
04-15-87.
(3) the department's examination information which may
include an identification of any other pertinent data, facts or
issues; and
(4) remarks concerning unresolved issues or questions
about the amendment such as the amendment was not signed by
all current owners, or was not notarized.
Examples:
AN AMENDMENT WAS SUBMITTED ON 08-01-98
REQUESTING TO AMEND THE PLACE OF USE. THE
AMENDMENT HAS NOT BEEN IMPLEMENTED AS IT HAS NOT
BEEN SIGNED BY ALL OWNERS OF DNRC RECORD.
AN AMENDMENT WAS SUBMITTED 06-11-98 ADJUSTING
THE POINT OF DIVERSION, PLACE OF USE, PRIORITY DATE,
SOURCE, FLOW RATE, PURPOSE AND PLACE OF STORAGE.
THE AMENDMENT SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGES THE
ORIGINALLY FILED STATEMENT OF CLAIM.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
a5db987e82acb5a41015422707d4fa2cd5b922d9345c7be1dcafcf4f43dd7323
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.