Bindinglaw

MT · rules

Mont. R. Prof'l Conduct 1.10

Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule

activein force · 2020-10-29 – presentact-effective-date

(a) While lawyers are associated in a firm, none of them shall knowingly represent a client

when any one of them practicing alone would be prohibited from doing so by Rules 1.7 or

1.9 unless:

(1) the prohibition is based on a personal interest of the disqualified lawyer and does

not present a significant risk of materially limiting the representation of the client

by the remaining lawyers in the firm; or

(2) the prohibition is based upon Rule 1.9(a) or (b) and arises out of the disqualified

lawyer’s association with a prior firm, and:

(i) the disqualified lawyer is timely screened from any participation in the

matter and is apportioned no part of the fee therefrom;

(ii) written notice is promptly given to any affected former client to enable

the former client to ascertain compliance with the provisions of this Rule,

which shall include a description of the screening procedures employed; a

statement of the firm’s and of the screened lawyer’s compliance with these

Rules; a statement that review may be available before a tribunal; and an

agreement by the firm to respond promptly to any written inquiries or

objections by the former client about the screening procedures; and

(iii) certifications of compliance with these Rules and with the screening

procedures are provided to the former client by the screened lawyer and by a

partner of the firm, at reasonable intervals upon the former client’s written

request and upon termination of the screening procedures.

(b) When a lawyer has terminated an association with a firm, the firm is not prohibited

from thereafter representing a person with interests materially adverse to those of a client

represented by the formerly associated lawyer and not currently represented by the firm,

unless:

(1) the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly

associated lawyer represented the client; and

(2) any lawyer remaining in the firm has information protected by Rules 1.6 and

1.9(c) that is material to the matter.

(c) When a lawyer becomes associated with a firm, no lawyer associated in the firm shall

knowingly represent a person in a matter in which that lawyer is disqualified under Rule

1.9 unless:

(1) the personally disqualified lawyer is timely screened from any participation in

the matter and is apportioned no part of the fee therefrom; and

(2) written notice is promptly given to any affected former client to enable it to

ascertain compliance with the provisions of this Rule.

(d) A disqualification prescribed by this Rule may be waived by the affected client under

the conditions stated in Rule 1.7.

(e) The disqualification of lawyers associated in a firm with former or current government

lawyers is governed by Rule 1.11.

Provenance

Source
courts.mt.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
6556f57c673fc116f06e772f6f2eb39a3bfb16621771c69983d59af18d3b8825
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Mont. R. Prof'l Conduct 1.10 — Imputation of Conflict… · binding.law