MT · rules
Mont. R. Civ. P. 8
General Rules of Pleading
(a) Claim for Relief. A pleading which states a claim for relief must contain:
(1) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief;
and
(2) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or
different types of relief.
(b) Defenses; Admissions and Denials.
(1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it;
and
(B) admit or deny the allegations asserted by an opposing party.
(2) Denials -- Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the
substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the
allegations of a pleading -- including the jurisdictional grounds -- may do so by a
general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either
specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically
admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only
part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and the
statement has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation -- other than one relating to the amount
of damages -- is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not
denied. If a responsive pleading is not required, an allegation is considered denied or
avoided.
(c) Affirmative Defenses.
(1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must affirmatively state any
avoidance or affirmative defense including, but not limited to:
• accord and satisfaction;
• action on advice of counsel;
• arbitration and award;
• assumption of risk;
• comparative negligence;
• discharge in bankruptcy;
• duress;
• estoppel;
• failure of consideration;
• fraud;
• illegality;
• injury by fellow servant;
• laches;
• license;
• payment;
• release;
• res judicata;
• statute of frauds;
• statute of limitations; and
• waiver.
(2) Mistaken Designation. If a party mistakenly designates a defense as a
counterclaim, or a counterclaim as a defense, the court must, if justice requires, treat
the pleading as though it were correctly designated, and may impose terms for doing
so.
(d) Pleading to Be Concise and Direct; Alternative Statements; Inconsistency.
(1) In General. Each allegation must be simple, concise, and direct. No technical form
is required.
(2) Alternative Statements of a Claim or Defense. A party may set out 2 or more
statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically, either in a single count
or defense or in separate ones. If a party makes alternative statements, the pleading is
sufficient if any one of them is sufficient.
(3) Inconsistent Claims or Defenses. A party may state as many separate claims or
defenses as it has, regardless of consistency.
(e) Construing Pleadings. Pleadings must be construed so as to do justice.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
1f36c334a844dbf7fe15552c2dd845053d169121db7d55fde091f9f43f834fc2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.