MT · rules
Mont. R. Civ. P. 60
Relief from Judgment or Order
(a) Corrections Based on Clerical Mistakes; Oversights and Omissions. The court may
correct a clerical mistake or a mistake arising from oversight or omission whenever one is
found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record. The court may do so on motion or
on its own, with or without notice. But after an appeal has been docketed in the supreme
court and while it is pending, such a mistake may be corrected only with the supreme
court’s leave.
(b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and
just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment,
order, or proceeding for the following reasons:
(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;
(2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been
discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);
(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or
misconduct by an opposing party;
(4) the judgment is void;
(5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on an earlier
judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer
equitable; or
(6) any other reason that justifies relief.
(c) Timing and Effect of the Motion.
(1) Timing. A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made within a reasonable time --
and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) no more than a year after the entry of the judgment
or order or the date of the proceeding. Motions provided by Rule 60(b) must be
determined within the times provided by Rule 59 in the case of motions for new trials
and amendment of judgment, and if the court shall fail to rule on the motion within
the time frames set forth in Rule 59(f), the motion must be deemed denied. A motion
filed under this rule shall follow the format set forth in Rule 59(b).
(2) Effect on Finality. The motion does not affect the judgment’s finality or suspend
its operation.
(d) Other Powers to Grant Relief. This rule does not limit a court's power to:
(1) entertain an independent action to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or
proceeding;
(2) grant relief to a defendant who was not personally notified of the action; or
(3) set aside a judgment for fraud on the court.
(e) Bills and Writs Abolished. The following are abolished: bills of review, bills in the
nature of bills of review, and writs of coram nobis, coram vobis, and audita querela.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
27f8c5e870480ddf881455da62b0adf6ad902b213a7bd4899d4868b40bf019fa
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.