MT · rules
Mont. R. Civ. P. 36
Requests for Admissions
(a) Scope and Procedure.
(1) Scope. A party may serve on any other party a written request to admit, for
purposes of the pending action only, the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule
26(b)(1) relating to:
(A) facts, the application of law to fact, or opinions about either; and
(B) the genuineness of any described documents.
(2) Form; Copy of a Document. Each matter must be separately stated. A request
to admit the genuineness of a document must be accompanied by a copy of the
document unless it is, or has been, otherwise furnished or made available for
inspection and copying.
(3) Time to Respond; Effect of Not Responding. A matter is admitted unless, within
30 days after being served, the party to whom the request is directed serves on the
requesting party a written answer or objection addressed to the matter and signed by
the party or its attorney, but, unless the court shortens the time, a defendant shall not
be required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of 45 days after
service of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. A shorter or longer time
for responding to requests for admission may be stipulated to under Rule 29 or be
ordered by the court.
(4) Answer. If a matter is not admitted, the answer must specifically deny it or state
in detail why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny it. A denial must
fairly respond to the substance of the matter; and when good faith requires that a party
qualify an answer or deny only a part of the matter, the answer must specify the part
admitted and qualify or deny the rest. The answering party may assert lack of
knowledge or information as a reason for failing to admit or deny only if the party
states that it has made reasonable inquiry and that the information it knows or can
readily obtain is insufficient to enable it to admit or deny.
(5) Objections. The grounds for objecting to a request must be stated. A party must
not object solely on the ground that the request presents a genuine issue for trial.
(6) Motion Regarding the Sufficiency of an Answer or Objection. The requesting
party may move to determine the sufficiency of an answer or objection. Unless the
court finds an objection justified, it must order that an answer be served. On finding
that an answer does not comply with this rule, the court may order either that the
matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. The court may defer its final
decision until a pretrial conference or a specified time before trial. Rule 37(a)(5)
applies to an award of expenses.
(b) Effect of an Admission; Withdrawing or Amending it. A matter admitted under
this rule is conclusively established unless the court, on motion, permits the admission to
be withdrawn or amended. Subject to Rule 16(e), the court may permit withdrawal or
amendment if it would promote the presentation of the merits of the action and if the court
is not persuaded that it would prejudice the requesting party in maintaining or defending
the action on the merits. An admission under this rule is not an admission for any other
purpose and cannot be used against the party in any other proceeding.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
2adf6b2a5e792ab9468d128067569da4682f9210dcc25d648013ce6116669a7e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.