MT · rules
Mont. Med. Legal Panel R. 7
Answer to Application
(a) Time for Filing Answer. Within twenty (20) days after receipt of the claim, the health
care provider shall file an Answer signed by the health care provider or the health care
provider’s counsel with the office of the Director. The filing with the Director shall be made
by sending the Answer to the office of the Director by mail or electronically. If the Answer is
sent electronically, the sender is responsible for verifying and establishing that the office of
the Director received and was able to view and download the Answer sent electronically. For
good cause shown, the Director may extend the time for a party to submit an Answer. The
Answer shall be deemed the Answer to any amended Application, unless within twenty (20)
days after the receipt of the amended Application, the health care provider delivers in the
same manner as required above, an amended Answer.
(b) Form of Answer. The Answer shall be made on the Answer Form provided by the office
of the Director, or by a separate legal pleading as permitted in the Answer Form and must be
signed by the Defendant or his or her counsel. Any Answer made, whether or not a separate
legal pleading is used as permitted on the Answer Form, must be made by using the
following general format:
(1) General Format. In responding to an Application, the health care provider shall:
(i) admit or deny the allegations asserted by Claimant;
(ii) include a statement authorizing the Panel to inspect all medical records and
information pertaining to the Application and, for the purposes of Panel inspection only,
waiving any privilege as to the contents of those records; and
(iii) state whether or not the Defendant would be willing to stipulate to permitting
health care provider panelists to attend the Panel Hearing from a distant location within the
state of Montana by way of web based communications arranged by the office of the
Director.
(2) Denials -- Responding to the Substance. A denial shall respond to the substance of
the allegation by setting forth why the provider denies the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials. If the health care provider intends to deny all the
allegations contained in an Application, the health care provider may do so by a general
denial that substantively responds to the Claimant’s allegations. A health care provider that
does not intend to deny all the allegations shall either specifically deny designated
allegations or generally deny all except those specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A health care provider that intends in good faith to
deny only part of an allegation shall admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A health care provider that lacks knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation shall so state, and the
statement has the effect of a denial. To the extent that a health care provider relies upon this
subsection to answer an Application, the provider shall submit an Amended Answer, which
meets the requirements of subsections (b)(1) through (b)(4) of this Rule 7, above, no later
than seven (7) days prior to the date of the prehearing conference required by Rule 14.
(c) Answer Served on Parties by Director. Upon the receipt of an Answer or an amended
Answer to an Application, the office of the Director shall serve a true copy of the same upon
the Claimant, and all other health care providers by mail or electronically.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
92d1ce2e79a3c2c4eb71cc8b165a5a1b4a67828572a205c8c3013c8ed96c4d2d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.