MT · jury_instructions
Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 9-117(a) (2022)
Issues in Manufacture or Delivery of Drug Paraphernalia
To convict the Defendant of Manufacture or Delivery of Drug Paraphernalia, the State must prove the following elements:
1. That the Defendant [delivered] [possessed with intent to deliver] [manufactured] drug paraphernalia;
AND
2. That the Defendant [knew] [under the circumstances reasonably should have known] the paraphernalia would be used to [plant] [propagate] [cultivate] [grow] [harvest] [manufacture] [compound] [convert] [produce] [process] [prepare] [test] [analyze] [pack] [repack] [store] [contain] [conceal] [inject] [ingest] [inhale] [or otherwise introduce into the human body] a dangerous drug;
AND
3. That the Defendant acted purposely or knowingly.
If you find from your consideration of the evidence that all of these elements have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the Defendant guilty.
If, on the other hand, you find from your consideration of the evidence that any of these elements has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt then you should find the Defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2022
- Content hash
a68b664aa5034bbea7cd2bed9a0dc20938985957d579a7c20cc3d43174dd81b2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.