Bindinglaw

MT · jury_instructions

Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 6-118(a) (2022)

Issues in Deceptive Practices

activein force · 2022-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

To convict the Defendant of deceptive practices the State must prove the following elements:

1. [That the Defendant caused _________________________, by deception or threat, to execute a document (disposing of property) (by which a pecuniary obligation is incurred);]

OR

1. [That the Defendant (made) (directed _________________________to make) a false or deceptive statement addressed to the public or to _________________________ for the purpose of (promoting) (procuring) the sale of (property) (services);]

OR

1. [That the Defendant (made) (directed another to make) a false or deceptive statement to any person respecting the financial condition of the Defendant for the purpose of procuring a loan or credit;]

OR

1. [That the Defendant accepted a false or deceptive statement regarding a person's financial condition from a person who is attempting to procure a loan or credit;]

OR

1. [That the Defendant obtained or attempted to obtain property, labor or services by (using a credit card which was issued to ______________ without his consent) (using a credit card that was revoked or canceled) (using a credit card that was (falsely made) (counterfeited) (altered) in any material respect) (using the pretended number or description of a fictitious credit card) (using a credit card which had expired and the credit card clearly indicated the expiration date)];

AND

2. The Defendant acted purposely or knowingly;

AND

3. The [deceptive practice was part of a common scheme] [value of any (property) (labor) (services) (obtained) (attempted to be obtained) is (greater than $1,500, but less than or equal to $5,000) (greater than $5,000)].

If you find from your consideration of the evidence that all of these elements have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the Defendant guilty.

If, on the other hand, you find from your consideration of the evidence that any of these elements has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt then you should find the Defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
courts.mt.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2022
Content hash
e7b4c3c094b198178c235921c11bb02fa81a230c6f1b3f6d685e8ab7f1f3be5f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.