MT · jury_instructions
Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 6-116(a) (2022)
Issues in Unlawful Use of a Computer
To convict the Defendant of unlawful use of a computer, the state must prove the following elements:
1. [That the Defendant obtained the use of a computer, computer system, or computer network without consent of _________________________;]
OR
1. [That the Defendant (altered) (destroyed) (caused _________________________ to alter or destroy) a computer program or computer software without consent of _________________________;]
OR
1. [That Defendant (obtained the use of) (altered) (destroyed) a computer, computer system, or computer network, or any part thereof as part of a deception, for the purpose of obtaining (money) (property) (computer services) from (_________________________, the owner of the computer, computer system, computer network or part thereof) (any other person);]
AND
2. That the Defendant acted knowingly or purposely;
AND
3. That the nature of the offense is one involving property exceeding $1,500 in value.
If you find from your consideration of the evidence that all of these elements have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the Defendant guilty.
If, on the other hand, you find from your consideration of the evidence that any of these elements has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt then you should find the Defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2022
- Content hash
c9d0749ff3a628cec8e7cb2ee17839457b5ebc1aebab876e8e9673816bb54ff0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.