Bindinglaw

MT · jury_instructions

Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 6-106(a) (2022)

Issues in Theft by Unauthorized Control

activein force · 2022-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

To convict the Defendant of the charge of theft, the State must prove the following elements:

1. That _________________________ was the owner of the _________________________ in question;

AND

2. That the Defendant purposely or knowingly obtained or exerted unauthorized control over the _________________________;

AND

3. [That the Defendant had the purpose of depriving _________________________ of the property;]

OR

3. [That the Defendant purposely or knowingly used, concealed, or abandoned the _________________________ in such manner as to deprive _________________________ of it;]

OR

3. [That the Defendant used, concealed, or abandoned the _________________________ knowing that _________________________ would probably be deprived of it;]

AND

4. That the value of the property is [more than $1,500.00, but less than or equal to $5,000.00] [more than $5,000.00 but less than or equal to $10,000.00] [more than $10,000.00].

If you find from your consideration of the evidence that all of these elements have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the Defendant guilty.

If, on the other hand, you find from your consideration of the evidence that any of these elements has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt then you should find the Defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
courts.mt.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2022
Content hash
75bd8e62dc5bc68f01053514800237cce28b2e6b0913c397e48b991a4d8f06c1
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.