MT · jury_instructions
Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 6-103(a) (2022)
Issues in Arson
To convict the Defendant of arson, the State must prove the following elements:
1. That the Defendant, by means of [fire] [explosives] [damaged] [destroyed] a [structure] [vehicle] [personal property, other than a vehicle, that exceeds $1500 in value] [crop, pasture, forest, or other real property] belonging to _________________________;
AND
2. That the Defendant did so without the consent of _______________________;
AND
3. That the Defendant acted knowingly or purposely;
OR
1. That the Defendant, by means of [fire] [explosives] [damaged] [destroyed] a [structure] [vehicle] [crop] [pasture] [forest] [other property] that _________________________ [owns] [has a possessory interest in], with the purpose of obtaining a pecuniary interest or other gain through fraud or deception;
AND
2. That the Defendant acted knowingly or purposely;
OR
1. That the Defendant, by means of [fire] [explosives] placed [_________________________] [_________________________, a firefighter responding to the scene of a fire or explosion], in danger of [death] [bodily injury];
AND
2. That the Defendant acted knowingly or purposely.
If you find from your consideration of the evidence that all of these elements have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the Defendant guilty.
If, on the other hand, you find from your consideration of the evidence that any of these elements has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt then you should find the Defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2022
- Content hash
108765e3a51e4094b8447e1ece1b8236b98ba07c30d701a1487052eafe735c2b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.