MT · jury_instructions
Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 5-123(a) (2022)
Issues in Robbery
To convict the Defendant of robbery, the State must prove the following elements:
1. That the Defendant [committed theft] [attempted to commit theft] [was fleeing after committing or attempting to commit theft];
AND
2. That the Defendant while so doing [inflicted bodily injury upon _________________________]; [threatened to inflict bodily injury upon _________________________]; [put _________________________ in fear of immediate bodily injury]; [committed or threatened to commit any felony other than theft];
AND
3. That the Defendant acted purposely or knowingly.
If you find from your consideration of the evidence that all of these elements have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the Defendant guilty.
If, on the other hand, you find from your consideration of the evidence that any of these elements has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt then you should find the Defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2022
- Content hash
13a2df0ef71728cffb05dd1704ba326beb48510cf3cee42c3b3d910cdb9c009a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.