Bindinglaw

MT · jury_instructions

Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 5-121(a) (2022)

Issues in Aggravated Kidnapping

activein force · 2022-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

To convict the Defendant of aggravated kidnapping, the State must prove the following elements:

1. That the Defendant restrained _________________________ by [secreting or holding him/her in a place of isolation] [using or threatening to use physical force];

AND

2. That the Defendant restrained _________________________ with the purpose to [hold for ransom or reward] [hold as a shield or hostage] [facilitate the commission of (any felony)] [facilitate the flight after the commission of (any felony)] [inflict bodily injury on _______________________] [inflict bodily injury on another] [terrorize _________________________] [terrorize another] [interfere with the performance of any (governmental) (political) function] [hold another in a condition of involuntary servitude];

AND

3. That in so doing the Defendant acted without lawful authority;

AND

4. That the Defendant acted knowingly or purposely.

If you find from your consideration of the evidence that all of these elements have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the Defendant guilty.

If, on the other hand, you find from your consideration of the evidence that any of these elements has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt then you should find the Defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
courts.mt.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2022
Content hash
9dca88aaab9e292e7344b735ff9fa915dc4e8a683ce78e1312bca1e57677a518
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 5-121(a) (2022) — Issues in A… · binding.law