MT · jury_instructions
Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 4-102(a) (2022)
Issues in Conspiracy
To convict the Defendant of conspiracy, the State must prove the following elements:
1. That the Defendant agreed with _________________________
to the commission of the offense of _________________________;
AND
2. That the Defendant did so with the purpose that the offense of _________________________ be committed;
AND
3. That an act in furtherance of the agreement was performed by any party to the agreement.
If you find from your consideration of the evidence that all of these elements have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the Defendant guilty.
If, on the other hand, you find from your consideration of the evidence that any of these elements has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt then you should find the Defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2009
- Content hash
3b7ba5748ae963573e270b0c3092817d226539c8cce18c852161c8da6f4d05bd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.