Bindinglaw

MT · jury_instructions

Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 3-107 (2022)

Use of Force by Parent, Guardian, or Teacher

activein force · 2009-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

[A parent] [An authorized agent of any parent] [A guardian] [A master] [A teacher] is justified in the use of force as is reasonable and necessary to restrain or correct his/her [child] [ward] [apprentice] [pupil]. In determining whether or not the force used is justified as reasonable and necessary you should consider along with all other evidence:

[1] the age of the child; and whether he/she is old enough to understand the punishment and benefit by it;

[2] the nature and degree of seriousness of the act for which the punishment was inflicted;

[3] the instrument used to inflict the punishment; and

[4] the nature of the injuries resulting from the punishment.

Provenance

Source
courts.mt.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2009
Content hash
f32afe8c169b0a7c3585d3c9dfd53b93175fa6ccb021dd67699e97ae1eb244b5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.