MT · jury_instructions
Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 2-115 (2022)
Issues-Accountability for the Conduct of Another
To convict the Defendant of _________________________ by being legally accountable for the conduct of another, the State must prove the following elements:
1. That the crime of _________________________ as defined in Instruction No. _________________________ has been committed; and
2. that the statute makes the Defendant so accountable.
[OR]
that the Defendant purposely or knowingly caused another to commit the act;
[OR]
that the Defendant, either before or during the commission of an offense, and with the purpose to promote or facilitate such commission solicits, aids, abets, agrees or attempts to aid, such other person in the planning or commission of the offense.
If you find from your consideration of the evidence that all of these elements have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the Defendant guilty.
If, on the other hand, you find from your consideration of the evidence that any of these elements has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt then you should find the Defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2022
- Content hash
148823ccc0e3b4e7f071d450f957d3107c2d06524838c0cc08301a3e896a996d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.