Bindinglaw

MT · jury_instructions

Mont. Crim. Jury Instr. 2-108 (2022)

Mental State Inference

activein force · 2009-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Purpose and knowledge ordinarily may not be proved directly because there is no way of fathoming or scrutinizing the operations of the human mind. But you may infer the Defendant's state of mind, including his/her purpose and knowledge, from the Defendant's acts and all other facts and circumstances in evidence which indicate his/her state of mind.

Provenance

Source
courts.mt.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2009
Content hash
361a47f6159f6d1cfb52db42c8eea6fb47a455c5e0684f1e15c247022c680f20
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.