MT · guidance
Mont. Medicaid Hospice Policy Manual, Policy 412
Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement
QUALITY ASSESSMENT
AND PERFORMANCE
IMPROVEMENT
The hospice must develop, implement, and maintain an effective,
ongoing, hospice-wide, data-driven quality assessment and
performance improvement program. The hospice's governing body
must ensure that the program:
1. Reflects the complexity of its organization and
services;
2. Involves all hospice services (including those services
furnished under contract or arrangement);
3. Focuses on indicators related to improved palliative
outcomes; and
4. Takes actions to demonstrate improvement in hospice
performance.
The hospice must maintain documentary evidence of its quality
assessment and performance improvement program and be able to
demonstrate its operation to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services.
PROGRAM SCOPE
The program must at least be capable of showing measurable
improvement in indicators related to improved palliative outcomes
and hospice services.
The hospice must measure, analyze, and track quality indicators,
including adverse member events, and other aspects of
performance that enable the hospice to assess processes of care,
hospice services, and operations.
PROGRAM DATA
The program must use quality indicator data, including member
care, and other relevant data, in the design of its program. The
hospice must use the data collected to do the following:
1. Monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and
quality of care.
2. Identify opportunities and priorities for improvement.
The frequency and detail of the data collection must be approved
by the hospice's governing body.
PROGRAM
ACTIVITIES
The hospice's performance improvement activities must:
1. Focus on high risk, high volume, or problem-prone
areas.
2. Consider incidence, prevalence, and severity of
problems in those areas.
3. Affect palliative outcomes, member safety, and quality
of care.
Performance improvement activities must track adverse member
events, analyze their causes, and implement preventive actions
and mechanisms that include feedback and learning throughout the
hospice.
The hospice must take actions aimed at performance improvement
and, after implementing those actions; the hospice must measure
its success and track performance to ensure that improvements are
sustained.
PERFORMANCE
IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS
CMS requires hospices to develop, implement, and evaluate
performance improvement projects. The projects should include:
1. The number and scope of distinct performance
improvement projects conducted annually, based on
the needs of the hospice's population and internal
organizational needs, and must reflect the scope,
complexity, and past performance of the hospice's
services and operations; and
2. The hospice must document what performance
improvement projects are being conducted, the
reasons for conducting these projects, and the
measurable progress achieved on these projects.
EXECUTIVE
RESPONSIBILITIES
The hospice's governing body is responsible for ensuring the
following:
1. That an ongoing program for quality improvement and
member safety is defined, implemented, and
maintained, and is evaluated annually;
2. That the hospice-wide quality assessment and
performance improvement efforts address priorities
for improved quality of care and member safety, and
that all improvement actions are evaluated for
effectiveness; and
3. That one or more member(s) who are responsible for
operating the quality assessment and performance
improvement program are designated.
History
Reference: ARM 37.40.805, 42 CFR 418.58. Supersedes: Policy 412, October 2016.
Provenance
- Source
- dphhs.mt.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- sltc-hospice-412-2018-10-01
- Content hash
0fa8b458b18a96b681b65d4bef57590983fda1aea712d8d7083b144e1ef79df3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.