MS · rules
U.R.Y.C.P. 6
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
(a) Procedures for issuing a subpoena duces tecum. No subpoena duces tecum for records
involving children, as such records are defined under section 43-21-105 of the Mississippi Code,
shall issue from any court other than youth court except upon compliance with the following
procedures:
(1) the party shall make an application to the court specifying which records are sought;
(2) the court shall issue a subpoena duces tecum to the youth court for these records;
(3) the youth court, unless a hearing is conducted pursuant to Rule 6(b) of these rules, shall
transfer copies of the records to the court;
(4) the court shall conduct an in camera inspection of the records, in accordance with the
procedures set forth in Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), to determine which records
should be disclosed to the party;
(5) the court shall, at all times, protect the confidentiality of the records to the extent required of
the youth court under Mississippi's Youth Court Law.
(b) Hearing on access to confidential files. The youth court may require a hearing to
determine whether the court or parties have a legitimate interest to be allowed access to the
confidential files. In determining whether a person has a legitimate interest, the youth court shall
consider the nature of the proceedings, the welfare and safety of the public, and the interest of the
child.
History
Comments & Procedures: Rule 6. The child’s right of confidentiality of youth records is a qualified privilege, not an absolute one. See Daniels v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 634 So. 2d 88, 93 (Miss. 1993). Mississippi has adopted the procedures advanced in Ritchie when there is a request originating in trial court proceedings for disclosure of confidential youth court records. See In re J.E., 726 So. 2d 547, 553 (Miss. 1998). These procedures require the trial judge to: (1) conduct an in camera review of the requested records and (2) release any information contained therein material to the fairness of the trial. Such is an ongoing duty. See Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 60 (1987).
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
01c06319cbe8645a64c4b64d08fff540dee9b6bc6e8f7bd507ed1e90a46d8807
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.