MS · rules
UCRCCC 1.15
MOTIONS FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGES
Any party may move for the recusal of a judge of the circuit or county court if it
appears that the judge’s impartiality might be questioned by a reasonable person knowing all
the circumstances, or for other grounds provided in the Code of Judicial Conduct or otherwise
as provided by law. A motion seeking recusal shall be filed with an affidavit of the party or
the party’s attorney setting forth the factual basis underlying the asserted grounds for recusal
and declaring that the motion is filed in good faith and that the affiant truly believes the facts
underlying the grounds stated to be true. Such motion shall, in the first instance, be filed with
the judge who is the subject of the motion within 30 days following notification to the parties
of the name of the judge assigned to the case; or, if it is based upon facts which could not
reasonably have been known to the filing party within such time, it shall be filed within 30
days after the filing party could reasonably discover the facts underlying the grounds asserted.
The subject judge shall consider and rule on the motion within 30 days of the filing of the
motion, with hearing if necessary. If a hearing is held, it shall be on the record in open court.
The denial of a motion to recuse is subject to review by the Supreme Court on motion of the
party filing the motion as provided in M.R.A.P. 48B.
History
[Adopted April 4, 2002.]
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
5ef6eaa27d2e06c2be21f65195e563c07b4de4ca62a5645e385c5f50aac6b029
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.