Bindinglaw

MS · rules

UCRCCC 1.15

MOTIONS FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGES

activein force · 2002-04-04 – presentact-effective-date

Any party may move for the recusal of a judge of the circuit or county court if it

appears that the judge’s impartiality might be questioned by a reasonable person knowing all

the circumstances, or for other grounds provided in the Code of Judicial Conduct or otherwise

as provided by law. A motion seeking recusal shall be filed with an affidavit of the party or

the party’s attorney setting forth the factual basis underlying the asserted grounds for recusal

and declaring that the motion is filed in good faith and that the affiant truly believes the facts

underlying the grounds stated to be true. Such motion shall, in the first instance, be filed with

the judge who is the subject of the motion within 30 days following notification to the parties

of the name of the judge assigned to the case; or, if it is based upon facts which could not

reasonably have been known to the filing party within such time, it shall be filed within 30

days after the filing party could reasonably discover the facts underlying the grounds asserted.

The subject judge shall consider and rule on the motion within 30 days of the filing of the

motion, with hearing if necessary. If a hearing is held, it shall be on the record in open court.

The denial of a motion to recuse is subject to review by the Supreme Court on motion of the

party filing the motion as provided in M.R.A.P. 48B.

History

[Adopted April 4, 2002.]

Provenance

Source
courts.ms.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
5ef6eaa27d2e06c2be21f65195e563c07b4de4ca62a5645e385c5f50aac6b029
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
UCRCCC 1.15 — MOTIONS FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGES · binding.law