Bindinglaw

MS · rules

Miss. R. Crim. P. 15.2

Proceedings at Arraignment

activein force · 2026-09-25 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Pleas. A defendant may plead not guilty, guilty, or, with leave of the court

in misdemeanor cases, nolo contendere.

(b) Failure or Refusal to Plead. If the defendant, on arraignment, refuses or

neglects to plead, stands mute, or pleads evasively, the court will enter a plea of

not guilty and will set the case for trial.

(c) Absence of Defendant. If the defendant is released on bail or recognizance,

and does not appear to be arraigned, or as required by the bond or recognizance,

the court may, in addition to forfeiture of bail, direct the clerk to issue a bench

warrant to bring the defendant before the court.

History

Comment: Rule 15.2 is largely based upon former Rules 8.03 and 8.04 of the Uniform Rules of Circuit and County Court. See also Miss. Code Ann. § 99-15- 23. The pleas enumerated in Rule 15.2(a) embrace the use of “best interest” or Alford pleas. See Sims v. State, 134 So. 3d 300, 302 n.3 (quoting North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37, 91 S. Ct. 160, 27 L. Ed. 2d 162 (1970)) (“under a ‘best interest plea,’ the accused ‘may voluntarily, knowingly, and understandingly consent to the imposition of a prison sentence even if he is unwilling or unable to admit his participation in the acts constituting the crime’”). But Alford added that: [b]ecause of the importance of protecting the innocent and of insuring that guilty pleas are a product of free and intelligent choice, various state and federal court decisions properly caution that pleas coupled with claims of innocence should not be accepted unless there is a factual basis for the plea, . . . and until the judge taking the plea has inquired into and sought to resolve the conflict between the waiver of trial and the claim of innocence. Alford, 400 U.S. at 38 n.10 (internal citations omitted). Rule 15.3(c) requires that “[b]efore the trial court may accept a plea of guilty, the court must determine that the plea is voluntarily and intelligently made and that there is a factual basis for the plea.” In Mississippi, nolo contendere pleas are unavailable in felony cases. See Welch v. State, 958 So. 2d 1288, 1289 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007); Bush v. State, 922 So. 2d 802, 805 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005); Keyes v. State, 312 So. 2d 7, 10 (Miss. 1975) (citing Bruno v. Cook, 224 So. 2d 567 (Miss. 1969)) (“the plea of nolo contendere is only available in light or petty misdemeanor cases, not in felony cases”); Miss. Code Ann. § 21-23-7(8). The entry of a nolo contendere plea also requires leave of the court. See Williams v. State, 130 Miss. 827, 94 So. 882, 884 (1923) (quoting 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Procedure, § 802) (nolo contendere “is pleadable only by leave of court”).

Provenance

Source
courts.ms.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
55af5501953ad95994a931f2d741d9d72d34f52fca5c9bb39183645250997bad
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.