MS · rules
Miss. R. Crim. P. 12.6
Subsequent Hearings
(a) Grounds. The court shall hold a hearing to assess the defendant’s
competency:
(1) on receiving a written report from a treating mental health
professional stating that, in his/her opinion, the defendant has
become competent to stand trial;
(2) on motion of either party, accompanied by the certificate of a
mental health expert stating that, in the expert’s opinion, the
defendant is competent to stand trial; or
(3) on the court’s own motion.
The parties may, by stipulation (either written or stated on the record in open
court), submit the matter on the experts’ reports.
(b) Finding of Competency. If the court finds that the defendant is competent
to stand trial, the regular proceedings shall recommence without delay. The
defendant shall be entitled to a rehearing of any proceeding if there are
reasonable grounds to believe the defendant was prejudiced by the defendant’s
previous incompetency.
(c) Finding of Continuing Incompetency. If the court finds that the defendant
remains incompetent, the court shall proceed in accordance with Rules 12.5(d)
or (e).
History
Comment: Section (c) directs the court, upon finding that the defendant remains incompetent, to reconsider the alternatives presented in Rules 12.5(d) and (e). Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715, 92 S. Ct. 1845, 32 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1972), held that the continuing commitment of a defendant must be justified by an appropriate showing by the state. Accordingly, the initial findings of the trial court are not relevant at this point, and questions regarding the continued incompetency of the defendant are to be considered by the trial court de novo.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
5f725ec46b97b5aef367154d8365833e1aaf01ec10291fe31f64a8c916693054
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.