MS · rules

Miss. R. Crim. P. 12.5

Hearing and Orders

activein force · 2026-09-25 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Hearing. After submission of the reports, the court, upon its own motion

or the motion of any party, shall promptly hold a hearing to determine the

defendant’s competency. The parties may introduce other evidence regarding

the defendant’s mental condition or, by stipulation (either written or stated on

the record in open court), submit the matter on the experts’ reports.

(b) Procedure. The competency hearing is a critical stage of the proceedings,

at which the defendant shall be represented by counsel. The defendant shall be

afforded an opportunity to testify, to present evidence, to subpoena witnesses,

and to confront and cross-examine witnesses who appear at the hearing.

to stand trial, then the court shall make the finding a matter of record and order

the case to proceed to trial.

(d) Finding of Incompetence. If the court finds that the defendant is

incompetent to stand trial, then the court may commit the defendant to the

Mississippi State Hospital, other appropriate mental health facility, or other

place of treatment, either inpatient or outpatient, based on the report of a

psychiatrist or psychologist pursuant to Rule 12.3(c)(2)(C) and (E). The order

of commitment shall be filed with the court clerk and shall require that the

defendant be examined by staff psychiatrist(s) and/or psychologist(s), and a

written report be furnished to the court not less than every four (4) calendar

months, stating:

(1) Whether there is a substantial probability that the defendant will

become mentally competent to stand trial within the foreseeable

future; and

(2) Whether progress toward competency is being made.

(e) Release from Commitment. If, within a reasonable time after entry of a

commitment order, there is neither a determination that there is a substantial

probability that the defendant will become mentally competent to stand trial nor

progress toward competency, the court shall order that civil proceedings as

provided in Mississippi Code Section 41-21-61, et. seq., be instituted. Said

proceedings shall advance notwithstanding that the defendant has criminal

charges pending against him/her. The defendant shall remain in custody until

determination of the civil proceedings.

History

Comment: Under Rule 12.5(a), upon the court’s own motion or the motion of any party, a competency hearing shall be conducted. But in the absence of such motion, a hearing is permissible, but not mandatory. This represents a departure from practice under former Rule 9.06 of the Uniform Rules of Circuit and County Court. Under section (d), if the court finds the defendant to be incompetent, it shall commit the defendant to an appropriate mental health facility or other place of treatment. No order made under this section is to be effective for longer than four (4) months, thereby insuring a frequent review of each incompetent defendant’s status and progress. See O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563, 575, 95 S. Ct. 2486, 2493, 45 L. Ed. 2d 396 (1975) (“even if. . . involuntary confinement was initially permissible, it could not constitutionally continue after that basis no longer existed”); Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715, 720, 92 S. Ct. 1845, 1849, 32 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1972) (a state “cannot constitutionally commit [a] petitioner for an indefinite period simply on account of his incompetency to stand trial on the charges filed against him”). Sections (d) and (e) largely continue the procedure applicable under former Rule 9.06 of the Uniform Rules of Circuit and County Court.

Provenance

Source: courts.ms.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-25
Edition: 2026-09-25
Content hash: 0969e2877aaf39b0085f04311148041fd144c067f60741c4147ffd6d375f7d5e

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs