MS · rules

Miss. R. Crim. P. 1.3

Computation and Enlargement of Time

activein force · 2026-09-25 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Computation. In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by

these Rules, by order of court, or by any applicable statute, the day of the act,

event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall

not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless

it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday, as defined by statute, or any other

day when the court clerk’s office is in fact closed, whether with or without legal

authority, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is

not a Saturday, a Sunday, a legal holiday, or any other day when the court

clerk’s office is in fact closed. In the event any legal holiday falls on a Sunday,

the next day shall be a legal holiday. When the period of time prescribed or

allowed is less than seven (7) days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal

holidays shall be excluded in the computation.

(b) Enlargement. When by these Rules or by order of court an act is required

or allowed to be done at or within a specified time, the court may at any time:

(1) with or without motion, and for cause shown, order the period

enlarged if request therefor is made before the expiration of the

period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order; or

(2) upon motion made after the expiration of the specified period,

permit the act to be done where failure to act was the result of

excusable neglect or good cause shown.

But a court may not, except as provided elsewhere in these Rules, extend the

time for making a motion for directed verdict, a motion for new trial, a motion

to vacate judgment, or for taking an appeal.

any action permitted by these Rules is not affected or limited by the existence

or expiration of a term of court. However, a criminal sentence cannot be

modified, altered, or vacated after the end of the term of court in which the

defendant was sentenced, except as provided by law.

(d) Motions Regarding Computation and Enlargement of Time. A written

motion, other than one which may be heard ex parte, and notice of the hearing

thereof, shall be served not later than five (5) days before the time fixed for the

hearing, unless a different period is fixed by these Rules or by order of the court.

Such an order may, for cause shown, be made on ex parte application. Service

shall be accomplished in accordance with Rule 1.7.

(e) Additional Time After Service by Mail. Whenever a party has the right or

is required to do some act or take some action within a prescribed period after

the service of a notice or other paper and the notice or paper is served by mail,

three (3) days shall be added to the prescribed period.

History

Comment: Rule 1.3 is derived from Rule 6 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure. Section (b) provides the court with wide discretion to enlarge various time periods both before and after the actual termination of the allotted time, with the notable exceptions of motions for directed verdict (Rule 21), motions for new trial (Rule 25.1), motions to vacate judgment (Rule 25.2), or appeals (Rules 29 and 30). Importantly, such enlargement is to be made only for cause shown. If the application for additional time is made before the period expires, the request may be made ex parte; if it is made after the expiration of the period, notice of the motion shall be given to other parties and the only cause for which extra time can be allowed is "excusable neglect or good cause shown." Section (c) does not abolish court terms. This Rule merely provides greater flexibility to the courts in attending the myriad functions they must perform, many of which were previously possible only during term time. The Rule is also consistent with provisions elsewhere herein that prescribe a specific number of days for taking certain actions rather than linking time expirations to the opening day, final day, or any other day of a term of court. The rule recognizes that judges do not have the authority to modify, alter, or vacate a criminal sentence after the end of the term of court during which the sentence was given, except as otherwise provided by law. See Creel v. State, 944 So. 2d 891 (Miss. 2006); Miss. Comm’n of Jud. Performance v. Russell, 691 So. 2d 929 (Miss. 1997).

Provenance

Source: courts.ms.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-25
Edition: 2026-09-25
Content hash: 832907f850202f770ba9a742664a24a2536c64c03c4ddb4599fb602fa1ff12d5

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs