MS · rules
Miss. R. App. P. 44
QUESTIONS CONCERNING VALIDITY OF STATUTES AND ORDERS
(a) Service. If the validity of any statute, executive order or regulation, municipal
ordinance, franchise or written directive of any governmental officer, agent, or body is raised
in the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals, and the state, municipal corporation, or
governmental body which enacted or promulgated it is not a party to the proceeding, the party
raising such question shall serve a copy of its brief, which shall clearly set out the question
raised, on the Attorney General, the city attorney, or other chief legal officer of the
governmental body involved.
(b) Right to Respond. The state, municipal corporation, or governmental body shall,
within the time allowed for the filing of a response to the brief, be entitled to file a response
and may subsequently be heard orally in the discretion of the court.
(c) Necessity. Except by special order of the court to which the case is assigned, in
the absence of such notice neither the Supreme Court nor the Court of Appeals will decide
the question until the notice and right to respond contemplated by this rule has been given
to the appropriate governmental body.
History
Comment: Rule 44 is based on Fed.R.App.P. 44 and Ala.R.App.P. 44. Failure to give notice is an omission which may be cured. Subsection (c) permits action to proceed in the case without notice by special order if the court determines that urgent action is necessary or that the challenged statute, order, or directive is so patently invalid that no response need be required from the affected body. Also, the governmental body may waive its right to respond. The appearance of the governmental body will ordinarily be in accord with the provisions of Rule 29 concerning an amicus curiae. Pursuant to Rule 25, the certificate of service of the party raising the question of validity should reflect compliance with this rule. The term "validity" is intended to be broad enough to encompass the method of enactment as well as the constitutionality and authority for any statute, ordinance or regulation. It does not include mere questions of construction and interpretation. This rule applies not only to appeals, but also to any extraordinary proceeding before the court. A provision for notice to the Attorney General in trial proceedings is found in M.R.C.P. 24(d).
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
b36177580e1e1bb8bb72998ef7e3d4df4ebb50728fa37d6318eca29b637a0a7a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.