MS · jury_instructions
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 3825
Nuclear Sabotage - Damage to Facility
[Name of defendant] is charged in count ___ with nuclear sabotage.
If you find beyond a reasonable doubt from the evidence in this case that:
1. On or about [date of alleged crime], in __________ County;
2A. [Name of defendant] [intentionally/willfully], maliciously, and unlawfully
[destroyed/damaged/attempted to cause damage or loss] to [name of nuclear electrical generating
facility], a nuclear electrical generating facility;
OR
2B. [Name of defendant] [intentionally/willfully], maliciously, and unlawfully
[destroyed/damaged/attempted to cause damage or loss to] the components of [name of nuclear
electrical generating facility], a nuclear electrical generating facility,
then you shall find [name of defendant] guilty as charged.
If the State did not prove any one of the above listed elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
then you shall find [name of defendant] not guilty of count _____.
History
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 3825 (current as of June 30, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
e4df240f9d7d6e2d585046d4d864769fc3bc28589b9366de0e6ebefa30c9ae84
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.