MS · jury_instructions
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 3815
Assisting a Person Avoid Lawful Telephone Service Charges - Second Offense
[Name of defendant] is charged in count ___ with avoiding lawful telephone service
charges.
If you find beyond a reasonable doubt from the evidence in this case that:
1. On or about [date of alleged crime], in __________ County;
2. Intending to defraud [name of person providing telephone or telegraph service], [who/which]
provided [telephone/telegraph] service, [name of defendant] [intentionally/knowingly/willfully]
and unlawfully [aided/abetted/assisted/helped/caused] [name of person] to avoid the lawful
charge for [telephone/telegraph] service by:
A. Charging the service to an existing telephone number without the subscriber's
authority or permission; or
B. Charging the service to an existing credit card number without the subscriber's
authority or permission; or
C. Charging the service to an nonexistent telephone number; or
D. Charging the service to an nonexistent credit card number; or
E. Charging the service to a telephone number to which service had been
[suspended/terminated], where notice of the [suspension/termination] had been given to
the subscriber; or
F. Charging the service to a [revoked/cancelled/expired] credit card number, where notice
of the [revocation/cancellation/expiration] had been given to the credit card holder; or
G. Using a code, pre-arranged plan, or similar [stratagem/deception] or device where
[name of defendant] [sends/receives] information; or
H. [Physically/Electrically/Acoustically/Inductively/Otherwise] [re-arranging/tampering
with/making a connection with] a telephone or telegraph facility or equipment; or
I. Using telephone or telegraph service, knowing or having reason to believe that a
[re-arrangement/tampering/connection] existed at the time of use; or
J. Using a ___________ [specify deception, false pretense, trick, scheme, device,
conspiracy, agreement, or means]; or
K. Fraudulently using false, changed, or stolen identification; and
3. [Name of defendant] was previously convicted of ____________________ [specify violation
of § 97-25-54] in _____________ [list court and details of previous conviction] on __________
[list date of previous conviction],
then you shall find [name of defendant] guilty as charged.
If the State did not prove any one of the above listed elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
then you shall find [name of defendant] not guilty of count _____.
Definition(s) in this Instruction:
In this instruction, “telecommunications service” means any service which charges a fee
to send or receive sounds, images, or data by a telephone, cell phone, or other
telecommunications device.
History
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 3815 (current as of June 30, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
a6aace8cee777ab64b0166e32cefad80626a5590d360bf449641789b6571322d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.