MS · jury_instructions

Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 3505

Receiving Money from an Automatic Cash Dispensing Machine with the Intent to Defraud - $100.00 or More

activein force · 2012-06-30 – presentas-observed

[Name of defendant] is charged in count ___ with using a credit card with the intent to

defraud.

If you find beyond a reasonable doubt from the evidence in this case that:

1. On or about [date of alleged crime], in __________ County;

2. [Name of defendant] unlawfully used a credit card to [receive/obtain/get] $100.00 or more

from an automatic (unmanned) cash dispensing machine, an ATM, intending to defraud the

____________ [specify credit card owner or credit card issuer],

then you shall find [name of defendant] guilty as charged.

If the State did not prove any one of the above listed elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

then you shall find [name of defendant] not guilty of count ___.

History

Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 3505 (current as of June 30, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Provenance

Source: courts.ms.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-25
Edition: 2026-09-25
Content hash: 81569d3b02d2a901f9eb141f8962775daeb2dd539610f7e1c0298674ba43e7cf

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs