MS · jury_instructions
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 3426
Larceny - Severing a Gate, Fence, Railing, or Other Improvement
[Name of defendant] is charged in count ___ with larceny by severing a gate, fence,
railing, or other improvement.
If you find beyond a reasonable doubt from the evidence in this case that:
1. On or about [date of alleged crime], in __________ County;
2. [Name of defendant] unlawfully cut or severed [a/an] __________ [specify the gate, fence,
railing, or other improvement], which was attached to a building; and
3. [Name of defendant] unlawfully took and converted the __________ [specify the gate, fence,
railing, or other improvement] for [his/her] own use, intending to steal the __________ [specify
the gate, fence, railing, or other improvement]; and
4. The __________ [specify the gate, fence, railing, or other improvement] [was/were] valued at
$500.00 or more,
then you shall find [name of defendant] guilty as charged.
If the State did not prove any one of the above listed elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
then you shall find [name of defendant] not guilty of count _____.
History
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 3426 (current as of June 30, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
a675b69cb47a637c4ffdffec5ba4ba343294fc90c8d9a3856c946a3bdedf56a0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.