Bindinglaw

MS · jury_instructions

Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 3425

Larceny - Severing Crops

activein force · 2012-06-30 – presentas-observed

[Name of defendant] is charged in count ___ with larceny by severing crops.

If you find beyond a reasonable doubt from the evidence in this case that:

1. On or about [date of alleged crime], in __________ County;

2. [Name of defendant] unlawfully cut or severed __________ [specify the crop or produce]

owned by [name of owner] and growing in the soil; and

3. [Name of defendant] unlawfully took and converted the __________ [specify the crop or

produce] for [his/her] own use, intending to steal the __________ [specify the crop or produce];

and

4. The __________ [specify the crop or produce] [was/were] valued at $500.00 or more,

then you shall find [name of defendant] guilty as charged.

If the State did not prove any one of the above listed elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

then you shall find [name of defendant] not guilty of count _____.

History

Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 3425 (current as of June 30, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Provenance

Source
courts.ms.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
387b0bf7c780857af034fc09a5ff4a90eb4b7f326ba93dc43cfe540b25c5387f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.