MS · jury_instructions
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 2757
Stalking
[Name of defendant] is charged in count ____ with stalking.
If you find beyond a reasonable doubt from the evidence in this case that:
1. On or about [date(s) of alleged crime], in ____________ County;
2A. [Name of defendant] [intentionally/purposely] and unlawfully
______________________________ [describe defendant’s alleged actions] towards [name of
victim];
OR
2B. [Name of defendant] credibly and unlawfully threatened [name of victim];
OR
2C. [Name of defendant] [intentionally/purposely] and unlawfully
______________________________ [describe defendant’s alleged actions] towards [name of
victim], which would make a reasonable person fear for [his/her] own safety, or for the safety of
another person, or fear harm or damage to [his/her] property,
then you shall find [name of defendant] guilty as charged.
If the State did not prove any one of the above listed elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
then you shall find [name of defendant] not guilty of count _____.
History
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Criminal 2757 (current as of June 30, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
566c6e669fea017b1c5a10be32d9f964b70bc66e6921f2ea9509016a3d3a34ed
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.