Bindinglaw

MS · jury_instructions

Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Civil 4906

Will Contests - Undue Influence - General Instruction and Verdict Form

activein force · 2012-02-17 – presentas-observed

Statement of Law

If the person making the will is under the undue influence of [a/another]

[person/organization/entity] when [he/she] executes the will, then the will is not valid and should

be set aside. Undue influence is conduct which [destroys/overcomes] the testator’s free will and

substitutes the [other person/organization/entity]’s [decisions/opinions/will] for that of the

testator’s. Every type of influence that [a/an] [person/organization/entity] may have over the

testator is not undue influence. Influence such as advice, suggestions, or requests is not undue

influence unless it is so demanding and continuous that it [destroys/overcomes] the testator’s free

will and the ability for [him/her] to make [his/her] own decisions.

In order for a will to be void because of undue influence, the evidence must show that the

resulting will was not the testator’s wishes or desires but those of the [other

person/organization/entity]. Undue influence does not have to be shown by direct evidence.

The time when the undue influence is applied is not necessarily the deciding factor in

making a will void. However, the undue influence must work directly on the testator’s mind and

control how [he/she] disposes of [his/her] property at the time [he/she] executes the will.

General Instruction

[Name of contestant] claims that [name of testator]’s will should be set aside because

[name of proponent] unduly influenced [name of testator] in making [his/her] will. In order to

establish this claim, [name of proponent] must prove all of the following are more likely true

than not true:

1. [Name of proponent] did not apply undue influence on [name of testator]; and

2. [Name of proponent]’s [will/wishes/desires] [was/were] not substituted for [name of testator]’s

[will/wishes/desires] and that [name of proponent] did not [destroy/overcome] [name of

testator]’s free will.

Verdict Form

We answer the questions submitted to us as follows:

1. Did [name of proponent] apply undue influence on [name of testator]?

YES _______ NO _______

If your answer to question 1 is NO, then answer question 2. If you answered YES, stop

here and tell the bailiff (or you must return a verdict in favor of [name of contestant]).

2. [Was/were] [name of proponent]’s [will/wishes/desires] substituted for [name of testator]’s

[will/wishes/desires] and did [name of proponent] [destroy/overcome] [name of testator]’s free

will?

YES _______ NO _______

If your answers to questions 1-2 are NO, then you must return a verdict in favor of [name

of proponent]. If you answered YES, stop here and tell the bailiff (or you must return a verdict in

favor of [name of contestant]).

History

Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Civil 4906 (current as of February 17, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Provenance

Source
courts.ms.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
02c7bd05736e4efaf7434e148b98e0addeeea3d8724a0c347667812520636826
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.