MS · jury_instructions
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Civil 4905
Will Contests - Sound and Disposing Mind (Testamentary Capacity) - General Instruction and Verdict Form
Statement of Law
In order for a will to be valid, the person making the will must have a sound and
disposing mind at the time [he/she] executes the will. A person has a sound and disposing mind
if [he/she] understands and appreciates:
1. The nature of [his/her] act in making the will;
2. The [beneficiary/beneficiaries] to whom the testator has given gifts in the will and the
testator’s relationship to [him/her/it/them]; and
3. The testator was capable of determining how [he/she] desired to dispose of [his/her] property.
The testator does not have to leave [his/her] property to others in a natural, reasonable, fair, and
just way.
General Instruction
[Name of proponent] has offered a document to be admitted as [name of testator]’s will
for probate. To establish that the document is [name of testator]’s will, [name of proponent] must
prove all of the following are more likely true than not true:
1. [Name of testator] understood and appreciated the nature of [his/her] act in making the will;
2. [Name of testator] understood and appreciated who the [beneficiary/beneficiaries] [was/were]
to whom [name of testator] had given gifts in the will and [name of testator]’s relationship to
[him/her/it/them]; and
3. [Name of testator] was capable of determining how [he/she] desired to dispose of [his/her]
property.
Verdict Form
We answer the questions submitted to us as follows:
1. Did [name of testator] understand and appreciate the nature of [his/her] act in making the will?
YES _______ NO _______
If your answer to question 1 is YES, then answer question 2. If you answered NO, stop
here and tell the bailiff (or you must return a verdict in favor of [name of contestant]).
2. Did [name of testator] understand and appreciate who the [beneficiary/beneficiaries]
[was/were] to whom [name of testator] had given gifts in the will and [name of testator]’s
relationship to [him/her/it/them]?
YES _______ NO _______
If your answer to question 2 is YES, then answer question 3. If you answered NO, stop
here and tell the bailiff (or you must return a verdict in favor of [name of contestant]).
3. Was [name of testator] capable of determining how [he/she] desired to dispose of [his/her]
property?
YES _______ NO _______
If your answers to questions 1-3 are YES, then you must return a verdict in favor of
[name of proponent]. If you answered NO, stop here and tell the bailiff (or you must return a
verdict in favor of [name of contestant]).
History
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Civil 4905 (current as of February 17, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
785842514b60fa5a27fca6295674cf6144bf5fb4781d8b3ad060415dd0f9b233
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.