MS · jury_instructions
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Civil 3602
Products Liability - Failure to Warn - Prescription Drugs or Medical Devices
General Instruction
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [he/she] was harmed by [a/an] ___________ [specify the
prescription drug or medical device] [manufactured/sold] by [name of defendant] which failed to
have adequate [warnings/instructions] and that [name of defendant] is legally responsible for
[name of plaintiff]’s damages. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the
following are more likely true than not true:
1. [Name of defendant] [manufactured/sold] the ____________ [specify the prescription drug or
medical device];
2. Taking into account the ordinary knowledge of a [physician/licensed professional], who
prescribes the ____________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device], when the
____________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device] left [name of defendant]’s
control, the ____________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device] failed to have
adequate [warnings/instructions], which a reasonable [person/manufacturer] under the same
circumstances would have given concerning the ___________ [specify the prescription drug or
medical device]’s danger(s), if any, and the ___________ [specify the prescription drug or
medical device]’s safe use(s);
3. When the ___________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device] left [name of
defendant]’s control, [name of defendant] knew or should have known about the danger(s), if
any, that caused [name of plaintiff]’s harm;
4. An ordinary user of the ___________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device] would
not have realized the __________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device]’s danger(s);
5. [Name of defendant]’s failure to give adequate [warnings/instructions] concerning the
__________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device]’s danger(s) made the
___________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device] unreasonably dangerous for
[name of plaintiff] to use;
6. [Name of plaintiff] was harmed by the ___________ [specify the prescription drug or medical
device]; and
7. [Name of defendant]’s failure to give adequate [warnings/instructions] concerning the
___________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device]’s danger(s) was a substantial
factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s damages.
Verdict Form
We answer the questions submitted to us as follows:
1. Did [name of defendant] [manufacture/sell] the __________ [specify the prescription drug or
medical device]?
YES _______ NO _______
If your answer to question 1 is YES, then answer question 2. If you answered NO, stop
here and tell the bailiff.
2. Taking into account the ordinary knowledge of a [physician/licensed professional], who
prescribes the ___________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device], when the
____________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device] left [name of defendant]’s
control, did the __________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device] have adequate
[warnings/instructions], which a reasonable [person/manufacturer] under the same circumstances
would have given concerning the ___________ [specify the prescription drug or medical
device]’s danger(s), if any, and the __________ [specify the prescription drug or medical
device]’s safe use(s)?
YES _______ NO _______
If your answer to question 2 is NO, then answer question 3. If you answered YES, stop
here and tell the bailiff.
3. When the ___________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device] left [name of
defendant]’s control, did [name of defendant] know or should [name of defendant] have known
about the danger(s), if any, that caused [name of plaintiff]’s harm?
YES _______ NO _______
If your answer to question 3 is YES, then answer question 4. If you answered NO, stop
here and tell the bailiff.
4. Would an ordinary user of the ___________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device]
have realized the ___________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device]’s danger(s)?
YES _______ NO _______
If your answer to question 4 is NO, then answer question 5. If you answered YES, stop
here and tell the bailiff.
5. Did [name of defendant]’s failure to give adequate [warnings/instructions] concerning the
_________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device]’s danger(s) make the _________
[specify the prescription drug or medical device] unreasonably dangerous for [name of plaintiff]
to use?
YES _______ NO _______
If your answer to question 5 is YES, then answer question 6. If you answered NO, stop
here and tell the bailiff.
6. Was [name of plaintiff] harmed by the __________ [specify the prescription drug or medical
device]?
YES _______ NO _______
If your answer to question 6 is YES, then answer question 7. If you answered NO, stop
here and tell the bailiff.
7. Was [name of defendant]’s failure to give adequate [warnings/instructions] concerning the
__________ [specify the prescription drug or medical device]’s danger(s) a substantial factor in
causing [name of plaintiff]’s damages?
YES _______ NO _______
If your answers to questions 1, 3, and 5-7 are YES and your answer to questions 2 and 4
are NO, then answer question 8. If you answered NO to question 7, stop here and tell the bailiff.
8. What are [name of plaintiff]’s damages?
$__________ TOTAL
After you have filled out the verdict form, please tell the bailiff that you have reached a verdict.
History
Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Civil 3602 (current as of February 17, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
05030b7eb8054f4214db9de88a5e18f98c99927c38b607f8aabae6f576414d85
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.