Bindinglaw

MS · jury_instructions

Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Civil 2601

Legal Malpractice - General Instruction and Verdict Form

activein force · 2012-02-17 – presentas-observed

General Instruction

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] was legally negligent and that [name

of defendant] is legally responsible for [name of plaintiff]’s harm. To establish this claim, [name

of plaintiff] must prove all of the following are more likely true than not true:

1. [Name of plaintiff] and [name of defendant] had an attorney-client relationship, specifically

________________________________________ [describe the alleged attorney-client

relationship];

2. [Name of defendant] was legally negligent by ____________________________________

[describe the defendant’s alleged negligence];

3. [Name of plaintiff] suffered damages as a result of __________________________________

[describe the defendant’s alleged negligence] because [name of plaintiff]

_____________________________ [describe the result that occurred or would not have

occurred except for defendant’s legal negligence]; and

4. [Name of defendant]’s legal negligence was a substantial factor in causing [name of

plaintiff]’s damages.

Definition(s) in this Instruction:

In this instruction, “negligence” or “negligent” means doing something that a reasonably

careful person would not do under similar circumstances or failing to do something that a

reasonably careful person would do under similar circumstances.

Verdict Form

We answer the questions submitted to us as follows:

1. Did [name of plaintiff] and [name of defendant] have an attorney-client relationship,

specifically ____________________________________ [describe the alleged attorney-client

relationship]?

YES _______ NO _______

If your answer to question 1 is YES, then answer question 2. If you answered NO, stop

here and tell the bailiff.

2. Was [name of defendant] legally negligent by ____________________________________

[describe the defendant’s alleged negligence]?

YES _______ NO _______

If your answer to question 2 is YES, then answer question 3. If you answered NO, stop

here and tell the bailiff.

3. Did [name of plaintiff] suffer damages as a result of _________________________________

[describe the defendant’s alleged negligence] because [name of plaintiff]

_____________________________ [describe the result that occurred or would not have

occurred except for defendant’s legal negligence]?

YES _______ NO _______

If your answer to question 3 is YES, then answer question 4. If you answered NO, stop

here and tell the bailiff.

4. Was [name of defendant]’s legal negligence a substantial factor in causing [name of

plaintiff]’s damages?

YES _______ NO _______

If your answer to question 4 is YES, then answer question 5. If you answered NO, stop

here and tell the bailiff.

5. What are [name of plaintiff]’s damages?

$__________ TOTAL

After you have filled out the verdict form, please tell the bailiff that you have reached a verdict.

History

Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Civil 2601 (current as of February 17, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Provenance

Source
courts.ms.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
b0cf7f4116d90a0327084a6a1c4343ea32bc705cd39b2a5281b8bcdfd42fe9b0
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.