Bindinglaw

MS · jury_instructions

Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Civil 2512

Negligence - Negligence by More than One Defendant - General Instruction and Verdict Form

activein force · 2012-02-17 – presentas-observed

General Instruction

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant 1] and [name of defendant 2]’s

negligence harmed or injured [name of plaintiff] and that [name of defendant 1] and [name of

defendant 2] are legally responsible for [name of plaintiff]’s damages. To establish this claim,

[name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following are more likely true than not true concerning

each defendant:

Section A - [Name of Defendant 1]

1. [Name of defendant 1] was negligent;

2. [Name of plaintiff] suffered damages as a result of [name of defendant 1]’s negligence;

3. [Name of defendant 1]’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s

damages.

Section B. - [Name of Defendant 2]

4. [Name of defendant 2] was negligent;

5. [Name of plaintiff] suffered damages as a result of [name of defendant 2]’s negligence; and

6. [Name of defendant 2]’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s

damages.

Definition(s) in this Instruction:

In this instruction, “negligence” or “negligent” means doing something that a reasonably

careful [person/business/corporation] would not do under similar circumstances or failing to do

something that a reasonably careful [person/business/corporation] would do under similar

circumstances.

Verdict Form

We answer the questions submitted to us as follows:

Section A - [Name of Defendant 1]

1.Was [name of defendant 1] negligent?

YES _______ NO _______

If your answer to question 1 is YES, then answer question 2. If you answered NO, stop

here and go to Section B.

2. Did [name of plaintiff] suffer damages as a result of [name of defendant 1]’s negligence?

YES _______ NO _______

If your answer to question 2 is YES, then answer question 3. If you answered NO, stop

here and go to Section B.

3. Was [name of defendant 1]’s negligence a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s

damages?

YES _______ NO _______

Go to Section B.

Section B - [Name of Defendant 2]

4.Was [name of defendant 2] negligent?

YES _______ NO _______

If your answer to question 4 is YES, then answer question 5. If you answered NO, stop

here and go to Section C.

5. Did [name of plaintiff] suffer damages as a result of [name of defendant 2]’s negligence?

YES _______ NO _______

If your answer to question 5 is YES, then answer question 6. If you answered NO, stop

here and go to Section C.

6. Was [name of defendant 2]’s negligence a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s

damages?

YES _______ NO _______

Go to Section C.

Section C

7. If your answers to questions 1-3 are YES, then give a percentage of fault to

[Name of defendant 1]: [Name of defendant 1] __________%

If you answered NO to any question 1, 2, or 3, then write 0 in the blank.

If your answers to questions 4-6 are YES, then give a percentage of fault to

[Name of defendant 2]: [Name of defendant 2] __________%

If you answered NO to any question 4, 5, or 6, then write 0 in the blank.

TOTAL 100 %

8. What are [name of plaintiff]’s damages? TOTAL $__________

History

Proposed Mississippi Plain Language Model Jury Instructions - Civil 2512 (current as of February 17, 2012). Submitted in 2012 by the Mississippi Model Jury Instructions Commission (created by the Supreme Court of Mississippi by order of December 30, 2008) and published by the Court on courts.ms.gov. The Court states that these model jury instructions have not been adopted or approved by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Provenance

Source
courts.ms.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
27ca98c97f1c2b1c43b9f21e5636dd6d53663ca1dcc51d45c16dc82cfa4356c2
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.