MN · rules
Minn. Law. Prof. Resp. Bd. Op. 24
Confidentiality of Information
Confidentiality of Information
Rule 1.6(a), Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct (Minn. R. Prof. Cond. Rule 1.6(a)), generally prohibits a lawyer from knowingly revealing information relating to the representation of a client. Contained within the subsections of Minn. R. Prof. Cond. Rule 1.6(b), however, are eleven enumerated exceptions to that general prohibition. Amongst those exceptions is Minn. R. Prof. Cond. Rule 1.6(b)(8), which permits a lawyer to reveal information relating to the representation of a client provided:
[T]he lawyer reasonably believes the disclosure is necessary to establish a claim or defense on behalf of the lawyer in an actual or potential controversy between the lawyer and the client, to establish a defense in a civil, criminal, or disciplinary proceeding against the lawyer based upon conduct in which the client was involved, or to respond in any proceeding to allegations by the client concerning the lawyer's representation of the client....
When responding to comments, negative or otherwise, posted on the internet (or any other public forum) concerning the lawyer's representation of a client, Minn. R. Prof. Cond. Rule 1.6(b)(8) does not permit the lawyer to reveal information relating to the representation of a client.
Lawyers are cautioned that, when responding to comments posted on the internet or other public forum which are critical of the lawyer's work, professionalism, or other conduct, any such response should be restrained and should not, under Minn. R. Prof. Cond. Rule 1.6(b)(8), reveal information subject to Minn. R. Prof. Cond. Rule 1.6(a).
Adopted: September 30, 2016.
Provenance
- Source
- revisor.mn.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
8102de9aeadc8c1b1abca64e80e27bba5a5dda56706ae97ae9ae970447ebdb47
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.