Bindinglaw

MN · rules

Minn. Code Prof. Resp. Interpreters 4

Professional Demeanor

activein force · 1996-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

Interpreters shall conduct themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the court.

History

(Added effective January 1, 1996.) Commentary Interpreters should know and observe the established protocol, rules, and procedures for delivering interpreting services. When speaking in English, interpreters should speak at a rate and volume that enables them to be heard and understood throughout the courtroom. If an interpreter is not actively interpreting, the interpreter should not engage in any distracting activity in the courtroom such as reading newspapers or magazines or engaging in conduct that may call inappropriate attention to the interpreter. Interpreters should dress in a manner that is consistent with the dignity of the proceedings of the court. Interpreters should avoid obstructing the view of any of the individuals involved in the proceedings, but should be appropriately positioned to facilitate communication. Interpreters who use sign language or other visual modes of communication must, however, be positioned so that signs, facial expressions, and whole body movements, are visible to the person for whom they are interpreting. Interpreters are encouraged to avoid personal or professional conduct which could discredit the court.

Provenance

Source
revisor.mn.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
1d1a85bc71924d94d6edca436010960527649c51fe5338af6981ac61c82af60e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Minn. Code Prof. Resp. Interpreters 4 — Professional… · binding.law