Bindinglaw

MN · rules

Minn. R. Evid. 903

Subscribing Witness' Testimony Unnecessary

activein force · 2019-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

The testimony of a subscribing witness is not necessary to authenticate a writing unless required by the laws of the jurisdiction whose laws govern the validity of the writing.

History

Committee Comment - 1977 To authenticate a writing there is no need to present subscribing witnesses unless otherwise required by the laws of the jurisdiction governing the validity of the writing. E.g., Minnesota Statutes 1975 Supplement, section 524.3 to 524.406, which in certain circumstances requires the production of an attesting witness.

Provenance

Source
revisor.mn.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
e3e9735a29ee1d42e25fcd4160ce4365ab3fe4e998687500301e54ff19a498af
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Minn. R. Evid. 903 — Subscribing Witness' Testimony U… · binding.law